Pengaruh Status Migrasi Melalui Karakteristik Sosio Demografi Terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Pekerja Di DKI Jakarta (Analisis Data Cross Sectional Susenas 2013)

Authors

  • Beti Nurbaiti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37721/je.v19i2.17

Abstract

Inequality in development facilities among regions is indicated by population migration flows,  as a reflection of inter-regional economic growth and public facilities disparities. DKI Jakarta has experience in population increase absolutely, in spite of having net migration rate.  This increase is caused by absolute number of in-migration into DKI Jakarta from outside of DKI Jakarta.The general objective of this research is analyze welfare status of Worker in DKI Jakarta and its relationships with other determinant variables (migration status and other socio-demographic variables). More specifically, the objectives of this research are: 1) to analyze welfare status of worker in DKI Jakarta; 2) to analyze the effect of migration status on worker’s welfare status; 3) to analyze  the effect of other socio-demographic variables on worker’s welfare status; and 4) to analyze the effect of interaction between migration status and other variables on worker’s welfare status in DKI Jakarta Province.            By using Susenas (National Socio-Economics Survey) 2013 raw data as a source of data, this research conducts analyze with two stages: 1) The first step is constructing the worker’s welfare status by using PCA (Principle Component Analysis); 2) the second stage is cross tabulating and multinomial logistic regression analysis to show the effect of migration status and other variables on worker’s welfare status in DKI Jakarta.            The result of analysis exhibits that migration status of workers in DKI Jakarta, and also their other variables, have various contribution on welfare status pattern.  However, the determinants variables have significant contributions to welfare status. The inferential analysis with interaction  model generates some conclusions as follows: migrant workers age of 24-34 tend to “welfare” 2.86 times, and tend to be “very welfare” 2.34 times; married migrant workers tend to be “welfare” 2.6 times; and migrant formal workers tend to be “very welfare” 6.14 times. Keywords: Welfare status, net migration, Susenas 2013, PCA,  multinomial logistic regression.

References

Alatas, Secha. 1987. Migran Wanita Di DKI Jakarta Dan Peranannya Dalam Ketenagakerjaan. Studi Hasil Sensus Penduduk. Prisma, Lembaga Demografi Universitas Indonesia.

Alatas, Secha. 1995. Migrasi Dan Distribusi Penduduk Indonesia. Kantor Menteri Negara Kependudukan/ BKKBN.

Aritonang. 1998. Perilaku Migrasi Migran Usia Kerja di Indonesia (Analisis Data Hasil Survey Aspek Kehidupan Rumah Tangga Indonesia /SAKERTI). Warta Demografi Januari Vol-3, Lembaga Demografi, Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Bocquier, Phillips. 2005. World Urbanization Prospects: An Alternative to the UN Model of Projection Compatible With the Mobility Transition Theory. The Journal of Demographic Research, Germany.

Chotib. 1998. Skedul Model Migrasi Dari DKI Jakarta/Luar DKI Jakarta : Analisis Data SUPAS 1995, Dengan Pendekatan Demografi Multiregional. Warta Demografi Agustus Vol 3, Lembaga Demografi, Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Chotib. 2003. Tinjauan Ekonometrika Model Migrasi dan Pembangunan Regional di Indonesia. Warta Demografi, Maret Vol 3 Fakultas Ekonomi, Lembaga Demografi, Universitas Indonesia.

Chotib. 2014. Dampak Mobilitas Ulang Alik Terhadap Kohesi Sosial Para Pekerja Di Komunitas Perumahan Depok. Disertasi. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, Program Pasca Sarjana, Departemen Sosiologi, Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Christensen, R. 1990. Log-Linear Models And Logistic Regression. Springer Verlag, New York Inc.

Ehrenberg G. Ronald dan Robert S Smith. 2002. Modern Labor Economics, Theory and Public Policy . Pearson Education Inc. United States of America.

Harfina, Dewi. 2008. Dampak Perbedaan Pendapatan Terhadap Keputusan Bermigrasi. Warta Demografi Agustus Vol-3, Lembaga Demografi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Agustus-Vol 7. Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Harris dan Todaro, M.P. 1970. A Model Of Labour Migration And Urban Unemployment In Less Developed Countries : American Economic Review, 59 (1), 138-148.

Saepudin. 2007. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Migrasi Risen Tenaga Kerja Masuk Ke Wilayah Bogor, Depok, Tangerang dan Bekasi (BODETABEK) Analisis Data SUPAS. Warta Demografi Juli, vol-2, Lembaga Demografi, Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Survey Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (SUSENAS), 2013. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), Provinsi DKI Jakarta.

Tjiptoherijanto, Prijono. 1997. Migrasi, Urbanisasi dan Pasar Kerja di Indonesia. Jakarta, Penerbit UI-Press.

Tjiptoherijanto, Prijono. 2000. Mobilitas Penduduk dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. Makalah disampaikan dalam Simposium Dua Hari Kantor Menteri Negara Transmigrasi dan Kependudukan / BAKMP, Jakarta 25 – 26 Mei 2000.

Wirakartakusumah, M. Djuhari. 1999. Bayang Bayang Ekonomi Klasik. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Jakarta.

Wisana, IDGK. 2014. Essay On Rural-To-Urban Migration, Labour Market And Economic Development In Indonesia. Dissertation, submitted for the degree of Doctor OF Philosophy Of The Australian National University.

Wiyono. 2003. Efek Jenis Migrasi Pada Status Sosial Ekonomi Perempuan Indonesia. Penerapan Two Part Model. Warta Demografi Maret Vol 3, Lembaga Demografi, Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Yadav, C.S. 1987. Rural Urban Fringe. New Delhi. Concept.

Yadava, KNS. 1989. Rural Urban Migration In India. Determinants, Patterns And Consequences. Delhi. Independent Publishing Company.

Downloads