Kajian Benefit-Cost Analisis Insentif Fiskal Untuk Perbaikan Kualitas Lingkungan Sektor Industri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37721/je.v17i3.276Abstract
Industrial activities are known as main contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Sources of GHG emissions from the industry sector are energy usage, industrial processes and industrial wastewater. Some existing fiscal instruments made specifically for industrial sector that has potential to be further elaborated and used to encourage industries in performing mitigation actions. These instruments are Ministry of Finance Decree (PMK) no 76/2012 on exemption of import duty on imported machines for industries, PMK no 130/2011 on tax holiday and also Government Regulation (PP) no 53/2011 on investment incentive. These instruments were made to trigger investments done in industries. Comparison of the loss revenue that government would get without the instrument to the emission reduction, we can show that tax holiday and tax allowance has a much lower cost of emission reduction to custom exemption in all scenarios. This study also found tax allowance to be the most effective policy to reduce greenhouse gas if the requirement to be inserted in the policy revision. Therefore, a coordinated effort is needed to ensure it is happening. However since tax allowance can only implemented in production facility expansion of different area, custom exemption, which work with precision of a surgeon’s scapel, should not be overlook. Having a list of equipments that scientifically proven to reduce green house gas to be given the incentive would be a strong suplement to reach Indonesia emission target. Keywords: Fiscal Incentives, Benefit Cost Analysis, GHG Emssion, Industrial SectorReferences
Amazonas Sustentável. Manaus. Available
online: http://www.fas-
amazonas.org/pt/useruploads/files/rela
torio2009_final.pdf
Fauzi, Akhmad, 2004. Ekonomi sumber
daya alam dan lingkungan: Teori dan
Aplikasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama;
Baumol, W.J. and W.E, Oates. 1975. The
Theory of Environmental Policy,
Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs. NJ;
FAS - Fundação Amazonas Sustentável.
Relatório de Gestão 2009.
Fundação
Field.B.C dan Field,.M.K. 2002.
Environmental Economics an
Introduction. Mc. Graw-Hill. New
York.
Munasinghe, M. and A.Schwab. 1993.
Environmental economics and natural
resource management in developing
countries. World Bank. Washington,
DC;
Malavasi, E. O, and J, Kalenberg. 2002.
Program of Payments for Ecological
Services in Costa Rica, Heredia Costa
Rica;
Owens, S. 2004. Siting, sustainable
development and social priorities.
Journal of Risk Research 7, 2: 101-
Pagiola, Stefano & Arcenas, Agustin &
Platais, Gunars. 2005. Can Payments
for Environmental Services Help
Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of
the Issues and the Evidence to Date
from Latin America," World
Development. Elsevier, vol. 33(2),
pages 237-253, February;
Pearce, D.W. and R.K. Turner. 1990.
Economics of Natural Resources and
the Environment. Harvester
Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead and
London;
Darsono, V. 1994. Pengantar Ilmu
Lingkungan. Universitas Atmajaya
Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta;
Ishihara, H., Pascual, U.2009. Social capital
in community level environmental
governance: a critique. Ecological
Economics 68 (5), 1549–1562;
Kishor NM, Constantino LF. 1993. Forest
management and competing land uses:
An economic analysis for Costa Rica.
LATEN Dissemination Note # 7.
Washintgton: The World Bank Latin
America Technical Department,
Environment Division;
Landell-Mills, Natasha dan Porras, Ina
T.2002. Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold?.
A Global Review of Markets for Forest
Environmental Services and Their
Impact on the Poor. The International
Institute for Envirinment and
Development (IIED). Harvard
University Press 508 p;
Van Noordwijk, M., B. Leimona, L.
Emerton, T. P. Tomich, S. J. Velarde,
M. Kallesoe, M. Sekher, and B.
Swallow. 2007. Criteria and
indicators for environmental service
compensation and reward
mechanisms: realistic, voluntary,
conditional and pro-poor. Nairobi,
Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre;
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. 2008. Methods to
estimate the costs of REDD.
Background paper 7, Norwegian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo;
Waage, S. 2005. A Guide To Conducting
Country-Level Inventories Of Current
Ecosystem Service Payments,
Markets, And Capacity Building,
Framework For Country-Level.
Forrest Trend, Washington, D.C. Jurnal Ekonomi, Volume 17 Nomor 3, Oktober 2015
Copyright @ 2015, oleh Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Borobudur
___________________________________________________________________________
Wunder, S. 2005. Payments For
Environmental Services: Some Nuts
And Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper
No. 42. Center For International
Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia;
Yakin, A. 2004. Ekonomi Sumber daya
Alam dan Lingkungan Teori dan
Kebijakan Pembangunan
Berkelanjutan, Akademika Presindo,
Jakarta.
Grieg-Gran, M. and J, Bishop. 2004. How
Can Markets for Ecosystem Services
Benefit the Poor? In: Roe, D. (ed.).
The Millennium Development Goals
and Conservation: Managing Nature’s
Wealth for Society’s Health. London,
UK: International Institute for
Environment and Development
(IIED): Chapter 4;
Cassola R.TEEB case. 2010. Financing
conservation through ecological fiscal
transfers Brazil. Available at:
http://www.teebweb.org/wp-
content/uploads/2013/01/Financing-
conservation-through-ecological-
fiscal-transfers-in-Brazil.pdf;
Chomitz, K. M., G. A. B. Da Fonseca, K.
Alger, D. M. Stoms, M. Honzák, E.
Charlotte Landau, T. S. Thomas, W.
Wayt Thomas, and F. Davis. 2006.
Viable reserve networks arise from
individual landholder responses to
conservation incentives. Ecology and
Society 11(2): 40. [online] URL:
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol
/iss2/art40/;
Rekonvensi, Bhumi.2004. Payments for
Environmental Services, Forest
Conservation and Climate Change.
Livelihood in REDD, edited by Luca
Tacconi, Sango Mahanty, Helen
Suich, Edward Elgar Publication.UK;
Rosen, Harvey S. 2010. Public Finance, 8th
edition, New York. N.Y.: McGraw-
Hill/Irwin;
Sankar, U. 2008. Environmental
Externalities. Didapat Online :
http://coe.mse.ac.in/dp/envt-ext
sankar.pdf;
Searle, R, S Colby, and KS Milway. 2004.
Moving eco-certification mainstream.
Boston: The Bridgespan Group;
Soerjani, Moh. et al. 1982. Lingkungan,
Sumber Daya Alam dan
Kependudukan dalam Pembangunan,
UI Press, Jakarta;
Thomas, Vinod .2001. Revisiting The
Challenge of Development. dalam
Frontiers of Development Economics,
The Future in Persfective, edt. Meir,
Gerals M. Joseph Stiglitz, World Bank
Press, Oxford University;