Pola Struktur Ongkos Ketenagakerjaan dan Ongkos Produksi Serta Dampaknya Terbadap Laba Usaha (Studi Komparasi UKM Pengrajin Perabotan Kayu yang Memperolch KUR dan Tidak Memperoleh KUR di Kec. Cakung Jatinegara Jakarta Timur)*
AbstractThis research is aim to get about the performance comparated for Sentra UKM has receipted KUR and Sentra UKM has not receipted KUR with the analysis of Labour Cost Structure, Production Cost Structure and their impact for the return to equity structure. The labour cost structure are not significant correlated and positive effect with the return to equity structure for UKM with KUR and UKM without KUR. The Production Cost Structure are better significant correlated and negative effect with the return to equity structure for UKM with KUR, but not significant correlatet and positive effect for UKM without KUR. The simultan approach, the labour cost structure and the production cost structure are not significant correlated and negatif effect with the return to equity structure for UKM with KUR and UKM without KUR. There are the another variables are most significant correlated and effect for the return to equity structure. Well, the diffi-ent about UKM with KUR and UKM without KUR are :1) better significant correlated and negatif effect for UKM with KUR and 2) not significant correlated and positif effect for UKM without KUR. Sugested for the related institution with UKM for give cozy accessibility for UKM Sentra Industri Kayu and Meubel at Kecamatan Cakung Jakarta Timur inside to institusional banking overall training programm. The training programm are about finance, accounting, marketing system, and production system, And then, to give the sustainable developing and coaching. For the banking institusional, is sugested to make the simplicity for credit administration and procedure, to decrease the credit interest and credit collateral.
Bambang Riyanto, 1998, Dasar- Dasar
pembelanjaan perusahaan, Edisi 5, BPFE
Brigham, • Daves, 2004, Intermediate
Financial Management, edisi 8.
Martono & Agus H, 2001, Manajemen
Keuangan, Cetatakan pertama, Ekonisia Jogj
Brigham, Eugene F., and Michael C.
Ehrhardt, 2005, Financial Adanagenient:
liTheory and Practice, Eleventh Edition, South
- Western, Australia: Thomson
Effendi M. Guntur, 2008, Analisis
Faktor - faktor yang mempengaruhi keberha
silan Kelompok Usaha Bersama ( KUBE )
serta Implikasinya-implikasinya pada
Peningkatan Pendapatan dan Pengentasan
Kemiskinan di Provinsi DK1 Jakarta.
Frank, Murray Z., and Vidhan K. Goyal,
, Capital Structure Decisions, Working
paper, Faculty of Commerce, University of
Columbia, and Department of Finance,
Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology, 1 - 55.
Laurent, Sandra, 2000, Capital Structure
Decision: The Use of Preference Shares And
Convertible Debt in the UK, Working paper,
Bristol Business School, University of the
West of England, 1 — 39.
Leland, Hayne E., 1998, Agency Costs,
Risk Management, and Capital Structure,
orking paper, Haas School of Business,
University of California, Berkeley, 148.
Modigliani, Franco, and Miller, Merton
H., 1958, The Cost of Capital, Corporate
Finance, and the Theory of Investment, the
American Economic Review, 48/3, 261 297.
Ogden, .Toseph P., Frank C. Jen, Philip.
F. OConnor, 2003, Advance Corporate
Finance, Policies and Strategies, Upper -
Saddle River, New Jersey: PrenticeHall.
Nazir, Moh. 2003. Metode Penelitian.
Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.
Seitz, Neil, 1984, Financial Analysis: A
Programmed Approach, Third Edition,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: A Reston
Book Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Shyam-Sunder, Lakshmi, and Stewart C.
Myers, 1999, Testing S-tatic Tradeoff Against
Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure,
Journal of Financial Economics, 51/2, 219 —
Sugiyono. 2005. Metode Penelitian
Bisnis, CV ALFABETA: Bandung.
Siaw Peng Wan, 1999, Corporate
Finance: Capital Structure Decision, Working
paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, 1 28.
Titman, Sheridan, 2002, The Modigliani
and Miller Theorem and the Integration of
financial _Mi srk. ets, Financial Management,